Talk:adnominal case

RFD discussion: December 2017–March 2018

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

adnominal case

Self-evidentally SoP. SemperBlotto (talk) 05:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Either keep and improve the definition or add the relevant sense to adnominal and then delete, but at the moment, even when I read our definition of adnominal I still have no idea what "adnominal case" means. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 11:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

The definition is strange, but it could be as SOP as many other cases (e.g. nominative case, genitive case), moods (e.g. imperative mood), person-number combinations (e.g. third-person plural). Might be a matter of WT:RFC to clean-up the definition. -80.133.107.175 06:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Keep and rewrite to no longer say just "The grammatical case that is adnominal"; thus, make more like nominative case. In general, I think the forms "ADJ case" pattern precedes the ADJ used alone as a noun. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:22, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Keep as per Dan Polansky. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 02:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

RFD kept: no consensus for deletion after 3 months. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)