Talk:adheriríeis

Deletion nomination

@Polomo47, MedK1 Where is the discussion about the existence of this term? An RFV was never opened. I can delete this page as "created in error" if the creator agrees, but there's a whole conjugation table for adherir. Do all those forms need to be deleted? Ultimateria (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Prior to my edit, there was an RFV tag by MedK (that never had a corresponding discussion opened). MedK created the entry, and he said it was an accident on the RFV tag’s text — he’d used the tag because he was unsure if it existed, but now we both know it really didn’t. Polomo47 (talk) 17:20, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Also, the conjugation table is probably wrong... In the back of my head, I kind of have a plan of how to fix it. I’ll discuss it with the others and try to finalize a proposal so we can ask Benwing to implement it. Polomo47 (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@Polomo47: In that case I'm temporarily removing the deletion nomination from this page; deleting just this one doesn't address the larger issue. Ultimateria (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

@Ultimateria: "but there's a whole conjugation table for adherir. Do all those forms need to be deleted?"

Only the ones with acute accents do. Diacritic usage prior to 1911 (i.e. back when you'd have spellings like -dh-) is pretty unclear, and it seems that diacritics other than the tilde really weren't used outside oxytones.

I'm not sure how they handled -íeis endings back in the day, but we're pretty confident that -íeis would not be the most common way to do it, or 'a way' at all. MedK1 (talk) 19:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

@MedK1: Thank you for the added context. Until the tables are updated though, I won't be touching any of these forms. Ultimateria (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)