Talk:Wu-ch'ia

RFV discussion: December 2020

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

Wu-ch'ia

(Withdrawn) 14:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Geographyintiative: Detailed area maps instead of sentences are well enough, as the map uses an English transcription. Even above for Huang-ch'i Metaknowledge admitted that the maps there constitute one cite. Fay Freak (talk) 14:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

(Withdrawn) 14:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Geographyinitative: As long as staunch lexicographers like you and me, who have an unbiased idea of what a dictionary should include, set the pace around here, it will be secure. The small Unicode difference in apostrophes cannot kill an entry – as as I said on other places we have to abstract from what has been written to what should be written anyhow, and nobody can argue that because the apostrophes are shaped not wholly identical in three quotes that therefore we don’t have enough occurrences of the word to keep it. And hypothetical stricter citation requirements are unfeasible; rather, if the CCP virus goes on on its rampage and the Usonians continue to be busy with themselves, we will have to reformulate the inclusion conditions and relax them because libraries are closed, printed papers are discontinued and there is barely enough personnel to assess the reality of entries in many languages – which we see is already necessary because the CFI are a bodge not well understood especially by those who should. Fay Freak (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

• Speedy keep. It's a waste of everybody's time to send something to RFV when it already has 3 cites. I think we all agree that this entry is perfectly fine. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 22:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 20:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)