Talk:Lipowiec

Re Special:Diff/80792779

@Vininn126: Could you explain why you made this edit, please? As far as I can see, the link generated by that coding points to a page containing only „Czy chodziło Ci o: ligowiec, liliowiec, liniowiec, linowiec, litowiec, polowiec, pomowiec” which, since we don’t mean to refer to any of those terms, is useless. Beneath that are links to „Lipowiec” in Porady językowe, Korpus Języka Polskiego PWN (to which the entry linked before your edit), and Encyklopedia PWN. The first of those is asking for usage advice regarding using quotation marks in constructions like rezerwat przyrody „Skolczanka” and zamek „Lipowiec”; i.e., it's only mentioning Lipowiec in an example for an unrelated purpose. The third of those lacks any relevant article; the only toponymous articles it features concern Lipowiec Kościelny in Masovia and Wygiełzów in Lesser Poland. Whereas the second of those at least has a couple of examples of use from PWN's Polish corpus, thereby constituting the richest of the slim pickings on offer. Clearly, you already recognised that the corpus examples were the only thing of relevance on that site; I was just saving our readers some inconvenience. Given all that, why revert the change? Would you object to my (functionally) remaking that change? Of course, since you deleted {{R:pl:PWN-URL}} and its documentation, a simple reversion is not practicable. Shall I add a |corpus= parameter to {{R:pl:PWN}}? Or, given the existence of {{R:pl:PWN Encyclopedia}}, shall I create {{R:pl:PWN Corpus}}? 0DF (talk) 12:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@0DF All solutions seem fine. A corpus template might be the easiest, but merging might more ideal on a technical level. Vininn126 (talk) 12:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Vininn126: OK. Do you want me to edit {{R:pl:PWN}} also to give it the functionality of {{R:pl:PWN Encyclopedia}}, with a view to replacing all transclusions of the latter with transclusions plus relevant parameter calls of the former? 0DF (talk) 12:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@0DF Do what you think is best, especially if you're up for cleaning anything up that results from this. Vininn126 (talk) 12:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Vininn126: {{R:pl:PWN Encyclopedia}} is used on ≤1,705 pages, which are too many to change by hand. That would need a bot run. 0DF (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@0DF Keep in mind we also have {{R:pl:Poradnia PWN}}, which is actually quite nice to have as a separate template for etymologies. I do not have a bot. Vininn126 (talk) 12:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Vininn126: I was unaware of that one. That means we only need {{R:pl:PWN Corpus}} for the complete set! I think I'll just create that. We can always merge the four templates at some future point, if it's ever felt to be necessary to do so. 0DF (talk) 12:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@0DF Sounds good. Vininn126 (talk) 12:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Vininn126: Done, done, and done. BTW, may I suggest that we move {{R:pl:Poradnia PWN}} to {{R:pl:PWN Poradnia}}, to keep all the PWN templates together alphabetically? {{R:pl:Poradnia PWN}} could be retained as a redirect, so it wouldn't affect anything except where the template is listed. 0DF (talk) 09:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@0DF Moved. Vininn126 (talk) 09:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@Vininn126: Great; thanks. What a very satisfactory resolution! 0DF (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)