Talk:Burzumesque

RFV discussion: November–December 2015

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

Burzumesque

should really not be here. hardly attested anywhere. Rathersilly (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

• Sounds like an RfV matter. bd2412 T 18:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Yowza! What a massive slippery slope candidate! I just checked for citations for "Stonesesque", "Beatlesesque", Tullesque", "Oldfieldesque", "Beach Boysesque", "Beastie Boysesque", and so on, citations exist (some hyphenated, some set solid) ...there are a lot of bands in the world.--Sonofcawdrey (talk) 22:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
    • If they’re citable, they’re citable; I don’t see why would should make an exception to exclude adjectives relating to specific bands or musicians. I wouldn’t worry about too much gibberish being added: Burzumesque is just barely citable, even though Burzum is one of the top 5 most well-known bands of its genre. — Ungoliant ^(falai) 22:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Not an RFD issue. Take it to RFV. Equinox ◑ 03:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

• Moved from RFD. @Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV, I'm sure you can cite it. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 03:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

• Added three cites. Okay? Want more? Equinox ◑ 03:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

  Thanks. I never doubted it, but I didn't feel like citing it. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 03:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

• RFV-passed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 20:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)