Talk:-ly

I'd like to point out that -ly hasn't always been as strictly obligatory for the formation of adverbs out of adjectives as in the contemporary language; in older stages, specifically Middle English, it was still optional to some extent, compare the introduction of this paper for the known history of -ly. In Old English, there was an older suffix still used to form adverbs, namely -e (early OE form -æ; sometimes lack of umlaut distinguishes adverbs from adjectives even though they would otherwise have become homonymous, for example clāne < *clānæ < Proto-Germanic *klainǣ, the adverb belonging to clǣne < *clǣni < Proto-Germanic *klainiz). This became a mere schwa vowel -e in Middle English via regular phonetic evolution, and was eventually lost on the way to Modern English, which is why adjectives and adverbs derived from them in the old way indeed became homonymous. A similar syncretism happened in German, which has happily done without a separate, obligatory marker for adverbs for centuries now, although it can, if needed, use a phrase analogous to in a X way/manner, and thus, adverbs are not distinguished from adjectives in German. Middle English, however, as explained in the paper, inherited -lice from Old English, which was re-interpreted as a new, productive adverb marker and eventually became more or less obligatory. However, there are still those mostly colloquial cases as I want it bad, pretty good, awful high etc., or even phrases found in formal language such as funny enough, and in light of the history, they should not be seen as failures to apply correct grammar but simply archaisms: phrases in which the older, Old English, way of forming adverbs, which eventually became unrecognisable by virtue of mechanic phonetic evolution, happens to be preserved. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 12:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

adverbs from nouns vs conversions

What about the adverbs slatternly or slovenly? --Backinstadiums (talk) 19:31, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

-ly to form adverbs from adjectives in -ie

What usage note corresponds to adjectives in -ie such as eerie? --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

summarily /səˈmErəi/

According to the Longman English Pronunciation Dictionary, the standard AmE of summarily is /səˈmɛrəi/ --Backinstadiums (talk) 11:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Used to form adverbs from adjectives.

Not in partly --Backinstadiums (talk) 10:20, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

coolly

Just as woolly --Backinstadiums (talk) 09:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

-edly

Although offhand (not ✳offhanded) is the standard adjective, offhandedly is the standard adverb --Backinstadiums (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

-edly ɪdli ədli (allegedlyis illogically formed, as it does not correspond to “in an X manner,” it's a convenient space- and time-saver for "it is alleged that" or "according to what is alledged". ) --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

-edly, as in designedly, has an entry of its own in the Longman Pronunciation Dictionary. --Backinstadiums (talk) 06:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)