Talk:𠄿

@Gold295857 What is your source for 𠄿 = 𧝕? —Fish bowl (talk) 01:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

These:

https://www.hancibao.com/guoyu/2013f

http://ccamc.co/cjkv.php?cjkv=%F0%A0%84%BF Gold295857 (talk) 03:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@Gold295857: Thank you. Please note that it says 疑同, i.e. they are unsure. (And also that hancibao is a defective clone of yedict.com; why are people suddenly using it?) Yedict refers to 汉语大字典, which does not make any such claim (see the link to a scan at zi.tools) and instead quotes Yupian, which does not explain anything except for pronunciation (𠄿，音圍). I think this is all very tenuous and the claim that 𠄿 = 𧝕 should be removed for now. —Fish bowl (talk) 01:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Good to know. My reason of using hancibao is that it was included in this Unicode kMandarin update, which I understand is different, but I still found it reliable. I also removed the 𠄿 = 𧝕. I currently use three sources to validate, being yedict, zi.tools, and ccamc.co. As a last request, if you could tell me if ccamc.co is reliable, that would be great. Gold295857 (talk) 04:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

hm, maybe hancibao is hiding something and I am misjudging it? (but i doubt it; yedict is the one who has a forum inviting people to contribute information, as well as other original content)

I have never used ccamc.co but I've seen references to it, and it looks solid to me (operated by someone who is identifiable and clearly has passion). —Fish bowl (talk) 05:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)