Talk:๐ก๐บ๐ซ๐๐ซ๐ฎ
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bhagadatta in topic -๐ซ๐-
-๐ซ๐-
[edit]@Bhagadatta ๐ฒ๐๐ข๐ก๐ผ intended -๐ซ๐- to be an interfix rather than a pleonastic suffix. So, the revised reason for the edit must be that surface analyses with infixes based on Sanskrit clusters should not be shown since that would not be synchronic. In that case, all of the entries currently in Category:Prakrit words by interfix would be removed. Kutchkutch (talk) 02:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Kutchkutch: Yeah, sorry, interfix is what I meant. It implies that such interfixes existed in Prakrit with which words could be formed but I'm unaware of such interfixes. It's also clear that the synchronic derivation cannot be given for terms like these, because, as you said, they come from Sanskrit clusters. So I vote for the removal of synchronic analysis for all the three entries in the category. -- ๐๐ฑ๐ช๐ฐ๐ช๐ญ๐ช๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ช(๐ฝ๐ช๐ต๐ด) 02:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC)