Talk:薩拉姆·阿萊控
Add topicLatest comment: 10 years ago by Atitarev
Why does this have an interpunct in the middle? Wyang (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Also, is this attested apart from the one speech by Wen Jiabao? Wyang (talk) 23:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Just to make it more readable. It doesn't have any consequences, Chinese "·" like Japanese "・" make it a bit easier to read long and compound loanwords, names, etc. A hyphen "-" or m-dash are also used but · is a Chinese symbol. I noticed articles use the same word with or without · in the same article, so · is, of course, optional. Does it need usage notes or alternative forms (with nothing or hyphen) or do you oppose having the symbol altogether?
- Can't comment on the second question. I've got this, though: 年尊敬的阿姆鲁，穆萨秘书长，尊敬的各位使节，女士们，先生们：萨拉姆-阿莱控(大家好)！ (遠望雜誌 - Issues 244-247; Issues 249-255 - Page 1)--Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:13, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Interpunct is only used in personal names and book sections (titles) in Chinese. The quote is from Wen Jiabao's speech. Wyang (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- What do you suggest? --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Interpunct is only used in personal names and book sections (titles) in Chinese. The quote is from Wen Jiabao's speech. Wyang (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- That this be sent to RFV or RFD. A single mention followed by translation in brackets is not sufficient to prove it is used. Wyang (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Go ahead, if you want. It's not in archived sources but it's quite common on the web. What about marking it as "neologism" and "rare" and not worry about RFV or RFD? It's already I'd feel sorry if the entry is gone, even if it's not as common. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:09, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- That this be sent to RFV or RFD. A single mention followed by translation in brackets is not sufficient to prove it is used. Wyang (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)