Talk:吃螃蟹
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Jusjih in topic RFD discussion: September 2018–July 2019
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This is very likely sum of parts and the sense's usage is limited to Lu Xun's quote. Probably better off deleted? --Tsumikiria (talk) 01:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Other than the common phrase 第一個吃螃蟹, I found some individual uses of this: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. May be worth keeping after cleanup. Wyang (talk) 05:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's certainly in use, but many of it uses quotations marks to surround it to indicate that it's from the Lu Xun quote, not "eating crabs" itself. Are there precedents to justify a inclusion? --Tsumikiria (talk) 07:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Are there precedents to delete things which usually have quotation marks around them? Helenpaws (talk) 08:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. I've cleaned up the page and included three quotes that use the phrase without quotation marks. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 08:02, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Kept. No consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 22:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. I've cleaned up the page and included three quotes that use the phrase without quotation marks. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 08:02, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Are there precedents to delete things which usually have quotation marks around them? Helenpaws (talk) 08:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's certainly in use, but many of it uses quotations marks to surround it to indicate that it's from the Lu Xun quote, not "eating crabs" itself. Are there precedents to justify a inclusion? --Tsumikiria (talk) 07:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)