Talk:佗落

chi̍t-loh

@Mar vin kaiser Do you think chi̍t-loh is 一落? — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 18:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

@Justinrleung: I've never understood it that way. I mean, there might be a slight possibility, but semantically, it doesn't make sense to me. For me, a sound change seems to make more sense. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

@Mar vin kaiser: Hmm, but tó/tá seems way too different for it to be related to chi̍t. I don't think it should be here. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 00:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Jinjiang has 底落 tit-loh, which seems a tiny bit closer, making the sound change more plausible. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 00:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)