Talk:گودرز

X.goodarzie (talk) 19:44, 29 December 2014 (UTC) dear Chuck, It seems to be unfamiliar with Iranian Linguistics. I mentioned D. N. MacKenzie's explanation of "gotarzes" / Godarz / Gotarz on its etymology. before removing or editing please check the references.

You need to use a human language when writing an etymology. This sequence of letters is incomprehensible — (gwtrz) Gōtarz : gwtrazk, gtrzk Gōtarzak. Γωτάρζης, Justi 118a, < *Gau-tarza-. Gau (cow, ox, < Pokorny *gu̯ou-); OIr. witness < Khot. ustairṣṭai 'you tore' , *us-tarz-, with Bailey H.W. Dictionary of Khotan Saka, 43a. Skr. tṛh 'to beat, crush', IE *teleĝh (Pokorny, 1062). --Vahag (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

X.goodarzie (talk) 03:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Sorry Vahag djan, but you are not insulting me. YOU are insulting D. N. MacKenzie. He was writing his explanation in this way. If you cannot figure an academic writing out, please enhance your academic skills.

> MACKENZIE, D. N., 1999, 'Iranica Diversa Volume 1', SOME NAMES FROM NISA, MQ 212.

Mr. Gudarzi jan, I looked at your source. As I suspected, MacKenzie did not write the gibberish you posted here. I have processed that and other sources and expanded the etymology. It is you who cannot figure out academic writing. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE learn simple reading comprehension. --Vahag (talk) 14:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

X.goodarzie (talk) 13:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Mr. Vakhagn dzhan, first, you should be grateful for being informed of an article in Iranian historical linguistics and then would you mind if you tell me what's the differences betwixt my style and the style of MacKenzie? at the end. Please Please Please Learn to be respectful to the others' identity and their names and surnames spellings.

I have had that article for many years. You have deleted half of MacKenzie's words. But that is beside the point. Even if you had quoted all of MacKenzie, we would have reverted you for the reasons Mr. Chuck gave you below. --Vahag (talk) 14:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

X.goodarzie (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC) Definitely You've known the article in advance. I can see it through out the entry/lemma before my revision. Anyway I abandon you WIKI-SCHOLAR Guys. Vobis Laetitiae!

Dear Mr Chuck, Are you really a student of linguistics and philology?

Have you ever heard the name of Daniel Neil MacKenzie? have you ever read his articles? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE before undo my editions just skimming the "MACKENZIE, D. N., 1999, 'Iranica Diversa Volume 1', SOME NAMES FROM NISA, MQ 212"

(edit conflict) If you can't figure out that this is a dictionary for a broad, English-speaking audience, then you're wasting your time here. Academic dictionaries use all kinds of abbreviations (which they explain in a separate part of the work, which you neglected to include...) because they have limitations of space, and the works are directed at a vary narrow audience. We don't, and we aren't.

In this case, the work is also still in copyright, so copying the format verbatim is also incompatible with our license. If all you can do is mindlessly regurgitate what you found in another dictionary, letter-for-letter, maybe you shouldn't be editing etymologies. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

---

X.goodarzie (talk) 04:33, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Yeah. You are right. I'm wasting my time over here. but lemme give you an advice. please learn linguistics profoundly if you wanna be a good one. Bye for good dude, yours

X.goodarzie (talk) 04:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC) illi mors gravis incubat, qui, notus nimis omnibus, ignotus moritur sibi (Seneca)