Talk:ϣⲑⲉⲣⲧⲉⲣ-
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Sérgio R R Santos
@Sérgio R R Santos Can you replace the content with the correct information instead of deleting the page? This case isn't really straightforward enough for speedy deletion so I'm removing the template for now. Also, put your rationale in the template itself (e.g. {{d|misspelling of x}}
), not the edit summary. Ultimateria (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- First, thanks for the advice, i'm kinda knew to wiktionary (at least as an editor) so i'm learning as I go along. Second, the page with the correct information already exists at ϣⲑⲟⲣⲧⲉⲣ, where this variant is listed as the nominal form, the one followed by a hyfen (as per Coptic conventions); such variants of Coptic verbs are usually not given their own page. Sérgio R R Santos (talk) 18:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I've read an old BP discussion on standardization (here) and see that, at the very least, the title is wrong. For what it's worth, there are 4 entries with the string
form of|cop|nominal state
(and a hyphen in the title). What do you think is more appropriate: formatting this page to match the other nominal forms or nominating them all for deletion? Ultimateria (talk) 03:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)- I think that ϣⲉⲡ-, where additional information about usage is given, should be kept while the other ones, who just say "nominal state of x", and this one should be deleted. Sérgio R R Santos (talk) 04:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I've nominated them for deletion here. Ultimateria (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- There, it's done. I hope I did everything by the books and didn't step on anyone's toes. Sérgio R R Santos (talk) 02:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I've nominated them for deletion here. Ultimateria (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think that ϣⲉⲡ-, where additional information about usage is given, should be kept while the other ones, who just say "nominal state of x", and this one should be deleted. Sérgio R R Santos (talk) 04:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I've read an old BP discussion on standardization (here) and see that, at the very least, the title is wrong. For what it's worth, there are 4 entries with the string