Reconstruction talk:Proto-Turkic/-dak

A proposal

Should we move this suffix into *-dürük? From what I understood from Erdal's book, *-dürük (boyunduruk, beldürük, oğulduruk) is the original followed by *-dük (orunduk, burunduk, Kip. ovuldux etc.) via crasis and then followed by *-dek (boğurdak, kekirdek etc.), although Clauson seems to seperate *-dek from *-dürük.

So (a) Should this be moved to *-dürük or (b) should *-dürük/*-dük be its own entry? What do you guys think? @BurakD53@Ardahan Karabağ Yorınçga573 (talk) 14:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

I think *-dak or *-dük is okay. Maybe Erdal is right but I don't think that's what we should. We can use etymology section. BurakD53 (talk) 23:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

I agree with Burak. I don't think they are related but we can mention them in etymology section Ardahan Karabağ (talk) 19:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)