Reconstruction talk:Proto-Balto-Slavic/súpnas

In the verb Jasanoff reconstruct mobile accent [Jasanoff 2017: p. 202]. However, Nikolaev reconstructs the accentuated paradigms (с) and (b₁) [Николаев 2014: paragraph 2.1.1.2.1. №16]. This is confirmed, apparently, by the Baltic, Greek, and Vedic data. There is a reason to reconstruct a fixed accent (or root with dominant valency). ---- Gnosandes (talk) 02:13, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

RFV discussion: February–April 2020

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

Reconstruction:Proto-Balto-Slavic/supnas

Gnosandes (talk) 03:15, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

• RFV-kept. The page is sourced and no further rationale was provided. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 03:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

@Metaknowledge, Don't delete this template, because I don't agree with this form. The accent is known, and this is confirmed by Greek and Baltic data. -- Gnosandes (talk) 07:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

PIE accent has little to do with PBS accent. --{{victar|talk}} 07:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

• Re-closed as kept. You can argue this point in the scriptorium, but this is simply not something RFV can solve. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 01:59, 5 April 2020 (UTC)