Reconstruction:Proto-Celtic/eti

This Proto-Celtic entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Celtic

Etymology

From Proto-Indo-European *éti. The particle *eti is currently the mainstream explanation for the difference between the absolute and conjunct forms in Old Irish and Old Welsh. However, other explanations of the absolute and conjunct have been proposed:

Cowgill and Kortlandt reconstruct this particle as *es and derive it from Proto-Indo-European *h₁ésti (“is”).
Roma and Budassi reconstruct subject pronouns instead of *eti as the clitic(s) that differentiated absolute and conjunct forms. They believe that their reconstruction also has the advantage of explaining the subject pronouns (like mé, tú, é, etc.) not occurring as subjects of inflected verbs in Old Irish.^[1]
McCone opposes all forms of the “particle hypothesis” and claims the postulated sentence particle faces more difficulties than it solves and requires numerous dubious ad hoc phonological assumptions. Instead he postulates the generalization of topicalized clause-initial verbs whose final -i was shielded by other enclitics if present, and then homogenization of forms with and without following enclitics in this position.^[2]

Particle

*eti

affirmative clause particle

Usage notes

This particle suffered severe transphonologization in Insular Celtic, after being contracted to *(e)s or possibly *eθ. It was placed as the second element of a sentence as an enclitic to the preceding word. The independent forms of Insular Celtic verbs arose from when *eti came after them, while the dependent forms arose whenever *eti did not do so.

In Old Irish, simple verbs folowed by this particle got to keep an extra syllable away from later apocope compared to the "plain" conjunct forms; contrast beirid and its conjunct form ·beir from *bereti.

Descendants

Gaulish: eti, t-ic
Old Irish: formed absolute and deuterotonic verb forms
Proto-Brythonic: formed absolute verbal forms

References

^ Budassi, Marco, Roma, Elisa (2018) “On the origin of the absolute vs. conjunct opposition in Insular Celtic”, in Indogermanische Forschungen, volume 123, number 1, De Gruyter, →DOI, pages 293-338
^ Kim McCone (2006) The Origins and Development of the Insular Celtic Verbal Complex (Maynooth Studies in Celtic Linguistics; 6), The Department of Old Irish, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, →ISBN, →ISSN

[1] Budassi, Marco, Roma, Elisa (2018) “On the origin of the absolute vs. conjunct opposition in Insular Celtic”, in Indogermanische Forschungen, volume 123, number 1, De Gruyter, →DOI, pages 293-338

[2] Kim McCone (2006) The Origins and Development of the Insular Celtic Verbal Complex (Maynooth Studies in Celtic Linguistics; 6), The Department of Old Irish, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, →ISBN, →ISSN

[1]

[2]