Reconstruction:Proto-Celtic/bodyā
Appearance
Proto-Celtic
[edit]Etymology
[edit]Pokorny's derivation from Proto-Indo-European *bʰewdʰ- (“to be awake”) is questioned by Matasović[1] and Schrijver for semantic reasons. Schrijver instead brings up the alternative *bʰed- (“to make better”) as the root.[2]
Noun
[edit]*bodyā f
Inflection
[edit]Feminine ā-stem | |||
---|---|---|---|
singular | dual | plural | |
nominative | *bodyā | *bodyai | *bodyās |
vocative | *bodyā | *bodyai | *bodyās |
accusative | *bodyam | *bodyai | *bodyāns |
genitive | *bodyās | *bodyous | *bodyom |
dative | *bodyāi | *bodyābom | *bodyābos |
locative | *bodyai | *? | *? |
instrumental | *? | *bodyābim | *bodyābis |
Reconstruction notes
[edit]The formations of the descendant forms are unclear.
- Schrijver prefers to unite the Brittonic and Goidelic forms under one form *bodyā. *-yā regularly disappears without a trace in Brittonic while yielding -e in Goidelic. The masculine gender of the Brittonic words would have to be secondary in this case.
- Matasović would rather reconstruct a base *bodos for the Brittonic masculine words, and derives buide from an *-iyā of this base.
Schrijver's reconstruction is adopted here out of simplicity.
Descendants
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Matasović, Ranko (2009) “*bodo-”, in Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 9), Leiden: Brill, →ISBN, page 70
- ^ Schrijver, Peter C. H. (1995) Studies in British Celtic historical phonology (Leiden studies in Indo-European; 5), Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi, pages 260-264