Category talk:Hungarian exaggerated adjectives

@Adam78, Einstein2: There are 470 exaggerated adjective forms that were created at the time when this form was still displayed at every adjective's headline. Later this functionality was removed. I'd like to know your thoughts about this form. Should it be added back to {{hu-adj}}? Should they be included in this dictionary? They are valid forms. Panda10 (talk) 18:07, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@Panda10 I don't think it should be added back to the template. In my opinion, we can keep the existing forms but no more such entries should be created, except if they are needed to exemplify something in particular. Adam78 (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@Panda10 Maybe we could require separate attestation for these forms as they are quite rare (even though they can be formed productively), although I don't think we should spend time with finding citations for the already existing entries. Also, an optional parameter could be added to the template – e.g. |exag=y – if the exaggerated form is attestable or already exists. – Einstein2 (talk) 09:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

@Adam78, Einstein2: Thank you both for your comments! They are very helpful in deciding about these entries. Panda10 (talk) 13:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)