Category talk:English coordinated pairs

RFM discussion: March–May 2017

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Category:English doublets vs Category:English lexical doublets

These two categories are named confusingly similar, even though they refer to completely different things. I propose that one of the two is renamed so that this confusion is removed. —CodeCat 17:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I agree. The "lexical doublets" category isn't about doublets at all, it's about coordinated pairs. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

I also agree. Shall we rename it to Category:English coordinated pairs? - -sche (discuss) 18:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

That seems like an improvement. —CodeCat 19:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

I've made the move, but the entries themselves need to be fixed too. Also, can we find a better parent category than Category:English language? —CodeCat 21:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I've moved the entry, and its subcategory to Category:English reduplicated coordinated pairs. - -sche (discuss) 21:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Pinging @Equinox since I think I saw them adding entries to this category recently. —CodeCat 21:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

So we should also move Category:English lexical triplets, right? Equinox ◑ 03:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I suppose so. Which name is better, "coordinated triples" or "coordinated triplets"? - -sche (discuss) 21:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done. Moved to "coordinated pairs" and "coordinated triples". - -sche (discuss) 18:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)