Category talk:Appendix-only constructed languages
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by 67.81.132.165 in topic Could any conlang be added?
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
I'd like to rename this category to Category:Minor constructed languages.
Rationales:
- Similarly named categories, such as Category:Appendix-only nouns, are gone. We deprecated this pattern.
- "Appendix-only" is too technical to appear in the name of the category; "minor constructed language" is all that matters in the first moment.
- The description of the category already explains that all the languages are "appendix-only", what that means, and why that happens. That description is much better than the short and vague "appendix-only" shoehorned in the title.
- I created the category in question.
--Daniel 05:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- But minor is inherently POV, which we should avoid. I wouldn't consider Quenya or Klingon any more "minor" than Novial (which we do include). -- Liliana • 11:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Could any conlang be added?
[edit]Is there anything stoping someone from adding a personal conlang or something like that? --67.81.132.165 12:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)