Appendix talk:Scientific journal abbreviations
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by Mglovesfun
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The journal titles wouldn't meet CFI, so why would the abbreviations of the titles? — Carolina wren discussió 06:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- It could be useful in fixing up abbreviations in the sources of quotations. It's definitely not useful for creating entries, though. If we keep it, we want to remove the links. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 13:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain, with a good cleanup it might be okay. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep A huge proportion of our abbreviations are of the names of entities that wouldn't appear here under any extant notion for broader inclusion of proper nouns. We have, de facto, a different inclusion standard, more or less consistent with our slogan. DCDuring TALK * Holiday Greetings! 14:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain, with a good cleanup it might be okay. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)