Jump to content

Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm for admin

Add links
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary

User:Bogorm for admin

[edit]
  • Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Bogorm as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Bogorm was nominated over 6 months ago, a vote which failed (here). Since then, to his credit, he has not been put off, and has addressed many of the concerns raised – while also keeping up a steady stream of excellent work in Slavic languages. I believe he would make a good user of the extra buttons. Ƿidsiþ 12:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Vote starts: as soon as the nomination is accepted
  • Vote ends: 24:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Acceptance: I accept the nomination. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 20:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Languages: bg, en-3, de-4, ru-4, fr-3
    • Timezone: UTC+2

Support

[edit]
  1. Support Ƿidsiþ 12:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC) As nominator.[reply]
  2. Support Razorflame 12:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC) Would make a great administrator! Razorflame 12:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --Stephen 13:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC) --Stephen 13:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Conrad.Irwin 13:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC) you aren't one?![reply]
  5. Support Pharamp 13:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support -- [ R*I*C ] opiaterein -- 15:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Eivind (t) 15:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Caladon 20:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Prince Kassad 20:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC) see conrad[reply]
  10. Support Neskaya contribs – talk? 21:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC) With the best of luck and my well wishes, no less. Bogorm has made vast improvements, and would be a very good administrator now. --Neskaya contribs – talk? 21:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Maro 22:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support I like Bulgarians. --Vahagn Petrosyan 23:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Bequw → ¢ • τ 00:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support —Internoob (Disc.•Cont.) 02:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Daniel. 02:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support —RuakhTALK 14:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support While I still have some reservations, my honest opinion is that he will make a good admin, even if he doesn't see eye-to-eye with all of us. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support † ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 05:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Ivan Štambuk 05:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support I believe he will make a good admin. – Krun 13:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support DAVilla 06:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support.​—msh210℠ 16:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Leo Laursen – (talk · contribs) 13:03, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support per Neskaya. DCDuring TALK 15:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

[edit]
  2. Oppose Dan Polansky 10:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC) I am not yet comfortable with the rate of archaisms in Bogorm's speech. On the talk page of Bogorm, there is a section "Antecedent confabulations". Yes, I can guess what it means, but I have to guess; I would be able to guess even if it were in Chinese. In that section, there is "Auguſt-November 2008", with "ſ". The user page is full of "ſ": assuming the talk page is to be read by other people, it should be as readable as possible.[reply]

    I consider Bogorm a very valuable contributor, and I confirm that his discussion style has significantly improved since the last vote. It is the role of an admin that I am disputing, not the role of a contributor. --Dan Polansky 10:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    He would make a far better administrator than many of our current administrators. Period. :) — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 23:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain

[edit]

Decision

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm_for_admin&oldid=8344009"