Jump to content

Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-07/User:Brett for admin

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary

User:Brett for admin

[edit]

Support

[edit]
  1. Support Equinox 23:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support DCDuring TALK 00:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --RuakhTALK 15:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Ivan Štambuk 15:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC) The more academicians around here, the better. --Ivan Štambuk 15:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support --Stephen 17:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support.​--msh210 18:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Ƿidsiþ 07:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Dan Polansky 09:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Lmaltier 09:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Usually, I prefer not to participate to votes, but I'll make an exception. Lmaltier 09:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support EncycloPetey 19:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support L☺g☺maniac chat? 22:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Yikes, almost missed this! :) L☺g☺maniac chat? 22:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

[edit]

Abstain

[edit]
  1. Abstain Neskaya kanetsv? 01:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC) --Neskaya kanetsv? 01:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Would you be willing to explain why? (Not that you have to, of course, but since abstentions don't really have any procedural effect, it seems like their primary use is as a place for comments?) --RuakhTALK 01:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Honestly, I just haven't had enough interaction with this user to be able to support the nomination. I haven't had negative interactions to oppose it, but. (And if it hadn't been when I was about to go to bed when I typed in the vote, I probably would have explained the first time.) --Neskaya kanetsv? 23:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Abstain No evidence of this user ever fighting vandalism on this wiki. SemperBlotto 13:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. abstain I haven't had any personal experience with this user. -- Prince Kassad 14:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decision

[edit]