Jump to content

Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2005-02/User:Wonderfool

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Discussion moved from Wiktionary:Administrators.

I would like to nominate Wonderfool for becoming a sysop. In fact, I'm actually just curious to see who would vote for me. I reckon I can do this stuff now. If only there were more users, then I'd probs be a dead-cert. --Wonderfool 12:31, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Please vote on what you think about this:

For:

  • --Connel MacKenzie 16:44, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) - You did about a thousand or two entries in Dec/Jan. I had some complaints about format, but content is content. Serious contributors should have the ability to seriously clean up vandalism too.
  • --\Mike 13:04, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) - No reason to object; seems to be a serious contributor
  • --Polyglot 13:34, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • --Kevin Rector 03:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Against:

  • --User:SemperBlotto would be against. (note: that was added by User:Wonderfool) - Well, it's true that he doesn't have the ability to keep to Wiki formatting all the time, and his English entries are not nearly as good as his French ones; but I am not voting either way. SemperBlotto 07:10, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)