Voting on: To solve the issue of the recent validation votes and to finally give due weight to the CFI change in February, I propose the following changes:
Other online-only sources may also contribute towards attestation requirements if editors come to a consensus through a discussion lasting at least two weeks.
with
Other online-only sources may also contribute towards attestation requirements if editors come to a consensus through a discussion lasting at least two weeks. See Wiktionary:Sources.
This vote has not yet started. It has been created to solicit advice on wording and fitness to purpose. Feedback and new ideas are highly encouraged! If you have not done so, please follow the discussion links for a better understanding of the topic. However, do not vote for any options at this time, as any premature votes may be struck. On the other hand, if the discussion is stagnant and there are no recent changes, anyone may choose to start this vote by properly listing it. Once the starting date has arrived, this banner may be ignored or removed.
Overview:
This votes creates a new voting venue for online-only sources. It also creates a central location where the result of all such votes are recorded.
The results of the two related BP threads (1, 2) are to be respected and incorporated into the list of discussed online sources of this vote. However, all further changes should be made through the venue proposed in this vote.
Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2022-01/Handling_of_citations_that_do_not_meet_our_current_definition_of_permanently_archived