Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:KamikazeBot for bot status

Support —Stephen ^(Talk) 04:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Interwiki bot of type r2.6.4 already has 85 bot flags in other Wiktionaries. —AugPi 01:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't see why the user needs a bot flag to edit two entries.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously it is not two entries. Those two entries are already done. It is ridiculous to think he wants to use a bot to edit two entries that he has already finished with. If you don’t understand what his examples mean, why don’t you ask him? —Stephen ^(Talk) 08:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dan Polansky 09:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC) I don't like this. The bot's purpose is likely to add interwiki links, but this is not explicitly stated in the vote. Furthermore, "first edit after update" referred to in the "Abstain" section below is one in Wikipedia. Moreover, this bot's name looks like the bot is about to destroy something while perishing itself in the process ;). We have Luckas-bot (talk • contribs) for interwiki, so we have no urgent need to add another bot for this. --Dan Polansky 09:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have now noticed the failed vote Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-10/User:KamikazeBot for bot status, for the record. --Dan Polansky 09:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In that failed vote, there was only one vote. It doesn’t mean anything. On English Wikipedia, KamikazeBot seems to be making about 500 edits a day, about twice as many as Luckas-bot. —Stephen ^(Talk) 10:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain : Luckas-bot (talk • contribs) is type r2.7.1, an updated version (right?). —AugPi 05:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Update was done yesterday, before your message. Karol007 12:39, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - First edit after update [3] (r2.7.2.) Karol007 12:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]