Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-09/User:Interwicket

User:Interwicket for bot status

• Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:Interwicket for the following purposes:
• Interwiki bot. Uses code written for wiktionaries, not the interwiki.py code, rather than running it as Tbot or UllmannBot. Robert Ullmann 23:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Vote ends: 2 October 2007 23:59 UTC
• Vote started: 23:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Discussion:

  WT:GP#Interwiki bot

  User talk:Interwicket

  meta:WM:IW-WIKT

Support

1. Support Robert Ullmann 23:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Will be very useful to have its own identification.
2. Support, not because I really care which of your bots does this, but because I don't really care which of your bots does this. ;-) —Ruakh_TALK 01:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
3. Support Connel MacKenzie 06:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Again: well done!
4. Support \Mike 07:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
5. Support DAVilla 16:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC) except the name :-P

   I'm not that excited about the name either, although I am a cricket fan. (Wicketkeeper? T20? ;-). The important bit is to have some formal 'bot vote, since this is outside the scope of UllmannBot. If people are happy with, or prefer, it just running that way as it is now, that's fine, but we do need the vote. Robert Ullmann 22:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

6. Support Cynewulf 16:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC) No more sticky wickets
7. Support Williamsayers79 07:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
8. Support EncycloPetey 00:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
9. Support ―Tohru 01:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Decision

• Passes 9-0-0. DAVilla 06:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)