Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2007-08/User:SemperBlotto for bureaucrat

User:SemperBlotto for bureaucrat

Nomination: I hereby nominate User:SemperBlotto as a local English Wiktionary Bureaucrat. To the extent that "bureaucrat" is a title of respect, few contributors are so clearly deserving. My selfish intention in this nomination, however, is simply to have a bureaucrat that's always available. DAVilla 12:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote ends: 17 September 2007 23:59 UTC
Vote started: 17 August

Acceptance:
- OK. This time I have read the small print, both here and on Meta, and have no objections. I cannot guarantee to be "always available" but I do logon several times on most days. SemperBlotto 13:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support Robert Ullmann 13:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support DAVilla 13:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Versageek 13:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jeffqyzt 13:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC) ...BTW, didn't User:Vildricianus resign as 'crat? Should there be resigned/inactive sections of that page (as per w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats)[reply]
Support —Stephen 14:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes please. Widsith 14:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thryduulf 14:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rod (A. Smith) 16:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Ruakh_TALK 16:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Connel MacKenzie 16:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support \Mike 17:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tohru 01:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArielGlenn 03:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support EncycloPetey 00:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. bd2412 T 02:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Saltmarsh 06:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Williamsayers79 17:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support As per nom. Neskaya ^talk 21:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Medellia 15:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dmcdevit·t 07:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support H. (talk) 14:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC) definitely.[reply]
Support Cynewulf 22:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this person and see potential. Thecurran 06:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Abstain

Decision

Does this vote need +25 or is this enough? DAVilla 19:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Judging by the other votes at Wiktionary:Bureaucrats, this is plenty. We just need to wait for one of the existing bureaucrats to notice this and take care of it. :-) —Ruakh_TALK 19:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do bureaucrats have the ability to appoint other bureaucrats? DAVilla 19:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. At least, they certainly used to be able to, and the documentation still says that they can. —Ruakh_TALK 22:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only time "minimum 25" comes into play, is when meta: rules override local policy - such as for CheckUser votes. --Connel MacKenzie 19:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Stating the obvious here. Passes 23-0-0. DAVilla 19:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Appointed --Dvortygirl 04:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]