User talk:WikitionaryGuy
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 years ago by WikitionaryGuy in topic Hi
Hi
[edit]What are you trying to achieve here? None of your edits make any sense to me.
Alternative-form entries like yoghurt don't need Wikipedia links; they can already be found at the main linked entry that it's an alternative form of. Equinox ◑ 00:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page? I’m still confused. WikitionaryGuy (talk) 08:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- For the record, the page was eighteen million, and the entire content was:
EnglishEtymology
- First of all, if you look at WT:CFI, there's no reason to create such an entry- there's a reason we don't have entries for every multiple of a million (there are literally millions of such entries possible, none of which provide anything of value to readers). Second, look at WT:EL. This entry had no headword or definition. Nothing but (correct) English and Etymology headers, followed by an etymology- which is wrong (if anything it's eighteen + million). No templates, so no categories. It was deleted as "No usable content given", which is a good description of what was wrong with the entry. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Oh. Understood. WikitionaryGuy (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
I am now creating a page for i don’t like you. WikitionaryGuy (talk) 06:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Why would you do that? No one writes the pronoun "I" in lower case and there's no point in creating entries for random sentences. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:54, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
The reason why I did it is because I believe it meets WT:CFI. WikitionaryGuy (talk) 06:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)