User talk:Thmazing/Archive 2014.01.14

Note left on Wikipedia for user Chuck Entz

Please unblock me from Wiktionary

If you look at my history, you'll see that I do NOT just enter "nonsense/gibberish"----

The particular entry you were complaining about I had a legitimate reason for and it did not cause any problems. If you'ld taken the time to examine the IP addresses of edits, you would have seen that the previous edit was also mine but that I had forgotten to log in (I was using a public computer). I try to keep track of all my contributions, so I logged in and made the so-called nonsense edit so the word would appear in my contributions list.

Blocking seems like a waaaaay out-of-measure response for that nonedit---I mean, I can't even leave this note on your Wiktionary page! I'm completely locked out!

Please unblock me and, if I may be so bold, reconsider your eagerness to block users. Take your time before going nuclear.

Thank you. Thmazing (talk) 17:34, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Because I'm blocked at the moment, I can't create a place to enter this citation:

1996: The Green Mile by Stephen King

1. There was a naked, uncomplicated honesty in what he said as he stood there talking with his hands jammed deep into the pockets of his biballs that was impossible not to believe.

Thmazing (talk) 17:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Official request for unblocking

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Thmazing (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • user creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

Hi. User:Chuck Entz blocked me for an edit he labeled "nonsense/gibberish" but was actually no edit at all and which I had entered not to be annoying but to help me keep track of an edit I had made when not logged in. What's even more mind-blowing is that he deleted that edit as well, a citation for clobbering I had entered under my IP address.

My primary interest in Wiktionary is adding citations of underserved words or definitions of words. I'm utterly mystified how that edit was inappropriate, but since he disappeared it, I can't even look at it any more to see if I can understand his [non]argument.

Vaporization of edit followed by blocking of user seems like a waaaaay out-of-measure response for whatever crime I've committed.

Please unblock me and return my edit to life.

Thank you.

Actually, now that I examine the edit log of clobbering again, it seems like these two events may be separate entities, only connected by coincidence. If so, I apologize for that portion of the misunderstanding. Thmazing (talk) 18:02, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Derived terms

have to actually be derived from the term featured in that entry. Perhaps you're looking for 'Related terms' instead? —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 05:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)