User talk:Robert Ullmann/L2/invalid

Check WT:LANGNAME to see if it's an alternative name.

Also see Wiktionary:LANGCODE#List_of_exceptions for a list of wiktionary-only language codes.

Notes on tough languages to sort

Just some notes on some of the persistent offenders so I don't have to relook up all the info over and over again. If anyone has any thoughts on how to clean these up, please feel free to contribute. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 06:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

• Ancient Chinese: May refer to Old Chinese or Middle Chinese
• Chaozhou = Teochew (see below)
• Gaulish: (Celtic) Multiple Gaulish languages; need to be clarified.
• K'iche': (Mayan): Multiple K'iche's; need to be clarified.
• Kaitij: Australian language (apparently), but no 'pedia article nor SIL code.
• Kurnai: (Australian), Dialect group, 'pedia article
• Middle Chinese: Has a 'pedia article. Some could be Late Middle Chinese (ltc)..
• Penobscot: See w:Penobscot#Language. It's Algonquian but not coded yet (ISO or here)
• Taimyr Pidgin Russian: No apparent 'pedia article nor SIL code.
• Teochew: Most sources treat this as a dialect of Min Nan.
• Toki Pona: (conlang) 'pedia article, but no SIL code. Not permitted by CFI.
• Wembawemba: (Australian) Has a 'pedia article (on the people who speak it, at least), but no SIL code.

Seneca

Seneca is valid isn't it? See the template {{see}}. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but there are technical issues that take time to resolve in segard to this. The {{see}} template was originally our {{also}} template. We wanted to give a lot of time before we made the final switch, to be sure people no longer were using {{see}}, so Seneca entries are going to be called "invalid" for a little while longer even thoguh they're actually OK. --EncycloPetey 15:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

More bugs

Interesting to see all the invalid 'English' level 2 headers. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

...and French, Japanese, Portuguese, etc. --EncycloPetey 15:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)