User talk:Msh210/Archive/Feminine plural
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Msh210 in topic Feminine plural indefinite forms of adjectives at entries for feminine singular indefinite forms?
This page is an archive of old discussion. Please don't edit this page. If you wish to communicate with me (msh210), you can do so at User talk:Msh210. Thanks!
Feminine plural indefinite forms of adjectives at entries for feminine singular indefinite forms?
[edit]What is that for?
—RuakhTALK 18:04, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- So people know the plural. Much (though not precisely) as we show the masc.pl. form of an adjective in the masc.sg. entry.—msh210℠ 18:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Never mind, this is just one instantiation of our perpetual disagreement. Feminine singular indefinite forms don't have plurals, because they're singular by definition; and we don't have entries for masculine singular indefinite forms, because those are the lemmata, so the lexeme entries suffice; but I've given up trying to convince you of this. :-P —RuakhTALK 02:36, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, hence the "not precisely".
:-)—msh210℠ 16:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, hence the "not precisely".
- Never mind, this is just one instantiation of our perpetual disagreement. Feminine singular indefinite forms don't have plurals, because they're singular by definition; and we don't have entries for masculine singular indefinite forms, because those are the lemmata, so the lexeme entries suffice; but I've given up trying to convince you of this. :-P —RuakhTALK 02:36, 6 August 2010 (UTC)