User talk:Da Vinci Nanjing

meaning

Your attempt at an English sentence has several mistakes in it. Please stick to editing languages you know well. Equinox ◑ 20:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

We're not Wikipedia, and you shouldn't try to add sentences in languages you can hardly speak. If you keep trying to put it back, you will be blocked. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 19:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Block review

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Da Vinci Nanjing (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • user creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=meaning&action=history

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Da Vinci Nanjing (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • user creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

If someone reverts this edit because of a faulty language: Maybe you never heard of it, but Wikipedia is based on Fixing erroneous content instead of deleting it.)

Hi, Da Vinci Nanjing. I understand you were blocked for repeatedly inserting an ungrammatical use example at meaning, even though you were asked not to do so (see the comments above). If there is any action by an editor you don't understand or disagree with, you should discuss it on the entry talk page (for example, at "Talk:meaning") or on a user talk page (here, for example), and not simply do the same thing again and again. This is seen as disruptive. Anyway, the block is only for 24 hours, so in a few hours you will be able to edit again. Thus, I don't think it is necessary for you to be unblocked at the moment. Thanks for your contributions, and please try to be more co-operative in the future. — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Da Vinci Nanjing, the block is for one day and will expire at 10:38:05 AM, 17 April 2017 (UTC). — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Block Review redux

Hello Da Vinci Nanjing. I have looked into your request and I think the block is justified. Please consider the feedback you have been given by various editors; repeatedly adding content which has to be removed by others, even if added in good faith, becomes disruptive and will result in blocks. - TheDaveRoss 12:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)