Template talk:sk-dub
Discussion
[edit]The 3-letter templates are reserved for language codes. The ISO 639-3 language code dub is for the language Dubli. Would people be okay if made this template have a "Slovak" prefix (moving it to {{sk-dub}} for instance)? We could use a 'bot to transition all the current usages over. Thanks. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 20:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- There are not that many files (about 64) that use this template at the moment, so it should not be a problem to change it to anything else. I think
{{sk-dub}}should be fine. —Stephen 09:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Move complete. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 18:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Templates that create wikilinks to appendices. Until now they weren't redundant to anything, I've now added a decl parameter to {{sk-noun}}. Further issues, they're horribly ambiguous - what would you think if you saw {{ulica}} on a page? Slovak entries, many of them created in 2004 by Red Prince (talk • contribs) are really messy. Probably not considered so at the time, but essentially a thousand or more entries need rewriting so there's no need to instantly orphan these if they fail, but rather replace them with {{sk-noun}} and {{sk-decl-noun}}. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- I am about to support deletion, but I want to confirm that I have understood the reason for deletion. It seems that you are saying this: "The templates should be deleted, because they are now redundant to template:sk-noun; what they do can now be achieved with template:sk-noun". Is that right? The entry "kalamár" now uses
{{stroj}}; can you replace the template in "kalamár" entry, so I can see in the revision history of "kalamár" what sort of formatting update you are proposing? --Dan Polansky 09:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)- Well not everything can (or even should) go in sk-noun, there should be more use of
{{sk-decl-noun}}and I don't know who will do that. Perhaps just by using{{rfinfl|lang=sk}}. Oh and see kalamár. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC)- Delete all; thank you for the example in "kalamár" (diff). Note that "Template:sk-decl-chlap" is just a renamed "Template:chlap" and that "Template:sk-dub" is just a renamed "template:dub", so each of the templates nominated for deletion was only intended by their creator to link to a declension appendix rather than showing a declension table, a function that is now indeed fulfilled by the headword-line template
{{sk-noun}}. Cool! --Dan Polansky 11:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)- All have failed, it will take a bit of time to delete them all. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note to self, finish off the last three. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- All have failed, it will take a bit of time to delete them all. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete all; thank you for the example in "kalamár" (diff). Note that "Template:sk-decl-chlap" is just a renamed "Template:chlap" and that "Template:sk-dub" is just a renamed "template:dub", so each of the templates nominated for deletion was only intended by their creator to link to a declension appendix rather than showing a declension table, a function that is now indeed fulfilled by the headword-line template
- Well not everything can (or even should) go in sk-noun, there should be more use of
- I have orphaned the templates
{{sk-decl-chlap}},{{sk-dub}}, and{{žena}}, so they can be deleted. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)