Template talk:resembles
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by JudahH in topic Not to be confused with
Not to be confused with
[edit]Would a better wording be "Not to be confused with"? I noticed this category while browsing and it struck me as odd: why would I want to know about unrelated words with superficially similar spellings unless I'd confused them with the word I were looking up? Also, the plural doesn't fit well with cases where there's only one example? I'd make the above-suggested change now, save that I'm not sure how bold to be when it comes to editing templates. JudahH (talk) 04:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)