Template talk:ja-decl-na
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Fytcha in topic RFD discussion: March 2020–January 2022
Deletion
[edit]{{ja-decl-na}} was replaced with {{ja-na}}.
I believe we have no reason to keep this template. --Carl Daniels 06:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. According to our loose naming conventions,
{{ja-na}}would be a headword/POS template, to be used before the definitions to give brief grammatical information and at most a few key inflections of the term, while{{ja-decl-na}}would be used in a ====Declension==== section to show the full declension of the headword. Rod (A. Smith) 00:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- This is the right name, but why do we need to repeat the conjugation of だ on every one of these words? Cynewulf 01:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Probably a deprecated template under Category:Japanese adjective inflection-table templates alongside {{ja-adjdecl}}. ～ POKéTalker（═◉═） 11:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
RFD-deleted. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 00:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)