Template talk:he-root

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Prevents transliteration, supports limited range of possibilities, complicates entry code, no apparent benefit. —Ruakh_TALK 16:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

You know damn well how easy it is to add transliteration support, and roots aren't vocalized to begin with, so transliteration isn't even particularly necessary. If you think there's no benefit, then maybe you would've liked to have moved all the root entries with - to ones with ־. You just don't want to see the things it could be used for because it wasn't your idea. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 20:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Come, now.—msh210℠ 03:53, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

It can use some bettering per nom, and some the nominator didn't mention, too. If we ever decide to categorize by root (as he.wikt does), this template will help a lot. Even otherwise, I see no particular reason to get rid of it.—msh210℠ 03:53, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Indeed, it could potentially do a lot. If you can think of anything that could be added to it, I'd be happy to add more to the template, but I made it for a simple purpose, so it started off simple. (We don't usually delete "stub" entries, do we?) — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 12:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep, not easy to do the same thing by hand, if anything some cleanup might be in order, ergo keep and improve. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Kept, I'll send Opiaterein a message about this. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)