Template talk:appendixonly

Length

This is very long and I only imagine will be continue to grow. Why don't we just use properly structured categories? We don't, for instance, have a template that lists all NS0-allowed languages. --Bequw → τ 20:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

I absolutely agree with you on the fundamental fact that properly structured categories are very much better than the current {{appendixonly}}. This template served as a staple for when this project of organizing non-main namespace pages was growing, but it subsequently became unwieldy. Before you sent your message above, I have created WT:BP#Splitting Láadan and other by groups to discuss this issue, suggesting smaller templates such as one to link all "minor auxiliary languages" together. Also, I naturally support using properly structured categories as you suggested. --Daniel. 22:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)