Template talk:Trichinellidae Hypernyms
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by DCDuring in topic RFD discussion: January 2022–October 2023
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Tagged 1.5 years ago by User:JoeyChen (diff) but not listed. User:DCDuring as the creator. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 22:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- See [1]. DCDuring (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Monotypic families don't necessarily remain so. In addition there are at least two other genera that are sometimes included in the family. DCDuring (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also sometime useful to save keystrokes for higher taxa by substing. DCDuring (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'd prefer that such templates not be made unless there are multiple uses for them, but once made and in use at least once, why not keep them for the reasons stated? DCDuring (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Also sometime useful to save keystrokes for higher taxa by substing. DCDuring (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Monotypic families don't necessarily remain so. In addition there are at least two other genera that are sometimes included in the family. DCDuring (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Tagged 1.5 years ago by User:JoeyChen (diff) but not listed. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 00:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- More than 100 genera besides Bacillus are in this family. We just don't have entries for them yet. DCDuring (talk) 19:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per DCDuring. — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 23:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
RFD-kept both. This, that and the other (talk) 03:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'd prefer that such templates not be made unless there are multiple uses for them, but once made and in use at least once, why not keep them for the reasons stated? DCDuring (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)