Template:RQ:Mill System of Logic
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
1843, John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. […], volume (please specify |volume=I or II), London: John W[illiam] Parker, […], →OCLC:
- The following documentation is located at Template:RQ:Mill System of Logic/documentation. [edit]
- Useful links: subpage list • links • redirects • transclusions • errors (parser/module) • sandbox
Usage
[edit]This template may be used on Wiktionary entry pages to quote John Stuart Mills' work A System of Logic (1st edition, 1843, 2 volumes). It can be used to create a link to an online version of the work at the Internet Archive:
Parameters
[edit]The template takes the following parameters:
|1=
or|volume=
– mandatory: the volume number quoted from in uppercase Roman numerals, either|volume=I
or|volume=II
.|2=
or|chapter=
– the name of the chapter quoted from.|section=
– the section number quoted from in Arabic numerals.|3=
or|page=
, or|pages=
– mandatory in some cases: the page number(s) quoted from in Arabic or lowercase Roman numerals, as the case may be. When quoting a range of pages, note the following:- Separate the first and last pages of the range with an en dash, like this:
|pages=10–11
or|pages=x–xi
. - You must also use
|pageref=
to specify the page number that the template should link to (usually the page on which the Wiktionary entry appears).
- Separate the first and last pages of the range with an en dash, like this:
- This parameter must be specified to have the template link to an online version of the work.
|4=
,|text=
, or|passage=
– the passage to be quoted.|footer=
– a comment on the passage quoted.|brackets=
– use|brackets=on
to surround a quotation with brackets. This indicates that the quotation either contains a mere mention of a term (for example, “some people find the word manoeuvre hard to spell”) rather than an actual use of it (for example, “we need to manoeuvre carefully to avoid causing upset”), or does not provide an actual instance of a term but provides information about related terms.
Examples
[edit]- Wikitext:
{{RQ:Mill System of Logic|chapter=Of Inference, or Reasoning, in General|volume=I|section=3|page=223|passage=Reasoning, in the extended sense in which I use the term, and in which it is synonymous with Inference, is popularly said to be of two kinds: reasoning from particulars to generals, and reasoning from generals to particulars; the former being called Induction, the latter '''Ratiocination''' or Syllogism. {{...}} The meaning intended by these expressions is, that Induction is inferring a proposition from propositions ''less general'' than itself, and '''Ratiocination''' is inferring a proposition from propositions ''equally'' or ''more'' general.}}
; or{{RQ:Mill System of Logic|Of Inference, or Reasoning, in General|I|section=3|223|Reasoning, in the extended sense in which I use the term, and in which it is synonymous with Inference, is popularly said to be of two kinds: reasoning from particulars to generals, and reasoning from generals to particulars; the former being called Induction, the latter '''Ratiocination''' or Syllogism. {{...}} The meaning intended by these expressions is, that Induction is inferring a proposition from propositions ''less general'' than itself, and '''Ratiocination''' is inferring a proposition from propositions ''equally'' or ''more'' general.}}
- Result:
- 1843, John Stuart Mill, “Of Inference, or Reasoning, in General”, in A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. […], volume I, London: John W[illiam] Parker, […], →OCLC, § 3, page 223:
- Reasoning, in the extended sense in which I use the term, and in which it is synonymous with Inference, is popularly said to be of two kinds: reasoning from particulars to generals, and reasoning from generals to particulars; the former being called Induction, the latter Ratiocination or Syllogism. […] The meaning intended by these expressions is, that Induction is inferring a proposition from propositions less general than itself, and Ratiocination is inferring a proposition from propositions equally or more general.
|