Template:RQ:Darwin Variation
1868, Charles Darwin, The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. […], volume (please specify |volume=I or II), London: John Murray, […], →OCLC:
- The following documentation is located at Template:RQ:Darwin Variation/documentation. [edit]
- Useful links: subpage list • links • redirects • transclusions • errors (parser/module) • sandbox
Usage
[edit]This template may be used on Wiktionary entry pages to quote Charles Darwin's work The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication (1st edition, 1868, 2 volumes). It can be used to create a link to online versions of the work at the Internet Archive:
Parameters
[edit]The template takes the following parameters:
|1=or|volume=– mandatory: the volume number quoted from in uppercase Roman numerals, either|volume=Ior|volume=II.|2=or|chapter=– the name of the chapter quoted from.|part=– if a chapter is divided into parts, the part number quoted from in uppercase Roman numerals.|3=or|page=, or|pages=– mandatory in some cases: the page number(s) quoted from. When quoting a range of pages, note the following:- Separate the first and last pages of the range with an en dash, like this:
|pages=10–11. - You must also use
|pageref=to indicate the page to be linked to (usually the page on which the Wiktionary entry appears).
- Separate the first and last pages of the range with an en dash, like this:
- This parameter must be specified to have the template link to the online version of the work.
|4=,|text=, or|passage=– the passage to be quoted.|footer=– a comment on the passage quoted.|brackets=– use|brackets=onto surround a quotation with brackets. This indicates that the quotation either contains a mere mention of a term (for example, “some people find the word manoeuvre hard to spell”) rather than an actual use of it (for example, “we need to manoeuvre carefully to avoid causing upset”), or does not provide an actual instance of a term but provides information about related terms.
Examples
[edit]- Wikitext:
{{RQ:Darwin Variation|volume=II|chapter=Provisional Hypothesis of Pangenesis|part=II|page=374|passage={{...}} I assume that cells, before their conversion into completely passive or "formed material," throw off minute granules or atoms, which circulate freely throughout the system, and when supplied with proper nutriment multiply by self-division, subsequently becoming developed into cells like those from which they were derived. These granules for the sake of distinctness may be called cell-'''gemmules''', or, as the cellular theory is not fully established, simply '''gemmules'''. {{...}} Their development is supposed to depend on their union with other partially developed cells or '''gemmules''' which precede them in the regular course of growth. {{...}} Lastly, I assume that the '''gemmules''' in their dormant state have a mutual affinity for each other, leading to their aggregation either into buds or into the sexual elements.}}; or{{RQ:Darwin Variation|II|Provisional Hypothesis of Pangenesis|part=II|374|{{...}} I assume that cells, before their conversion into completely passive or "formed material," throw off minute granules or atoms, which circulate freely throughout the system, and when supplied with proper nutriment multiply by self-division, subsequently becoming developed into cells like those from which they were derived. These granules for the sake of distinctness may be called cell-'''gemmules''', or, as the cellular theory is not fully established, simply '''gemmules'''. {{...}} Their development is supposed to depend on their union with other partially developed cells or '''gemmules''' which precede them in the regular course of growth. {{...}} Lastly, I assume that the '''gemmules''' in their dormant state have a mutual affinity for each other, leading to their aggregation either into buds or into the sexual elements.}}
- Result:
- 1868, Charles Darwin, “Provisional Hypothesis of Pangenesis”, in The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. […], volume II, London: John Murray, […], →OCLC, part II, page 374:
- […] I assume that cells, before their conversion into completely passive or "formed material," throw off minute granules or atoms, which circulate freely throughout the system, and when supplied with proper nutriment multiply by self-division, subsequently becoming developed into cells like those from which they were derived. These granules for the sake of distinctness may be called cell-gemmules, or, as the cellular theory is not fully established, simply gemmules. […] Their development is supposed to depend on their union with other partially developed cells or gemmules which precede them in the regular course of growth. […] Lastly, I assume that the gemmules in their dormant state have a mutual affinity for each other, leading to their aggregation either into buds or into the sexual elements.
| ||||||||