Talk:yuk

Should I add the verb, "to yuk it up" here, or under another article?zigzig20s 09:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

It could be listed in a ===Derived terms=== section. Isn't it yuk it up? --Connel MacKenzie 04:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure, it's just that it is a verb, the preposition in the definition isn't important. I wouldn't have used it in the definition anyway, I just wouldn't not say it when I'm talking/typing...Thanks for the info though.zigzig20s 08:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

RFD discussion

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

"Tocharian A" language section - no ISO 639 code. --Connel MacKenzie 04:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

It's a real Indo-European language, but it's long extinct. See w:Tocharian languages for information about Tocharian A and B. I don't know any more than the article; they're pretty obscure languages. --EncycloPetey 04:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. --Connel MacKenzie 08:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Where are you getting your ISO 639 codes from? Tocharian A does indeed have one, and it's xto. --Ptcamn 00:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)