Talk:whatth
Latest comment: 17 years ago by DAVilla
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Books.google, google, and onelook all turn up squat. - [The]DaveRoss 17:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- If it were ever written at all, it would be whateth. —Stephen 18:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- May I say that this entry represents poor English, which should not be encouraged? It's not a real word; if you're speaking English you should say "On which day of November is ...?" [No signature] 06:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Done. DAVilla 08:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. But, what good is it putting blog links in? Is that supposed to convey an added sense of illiteracy? Those are not durably archived, (not guaranteed to be working links to that exact text one year from now) so why are they there? --Connel MacKenzie 17:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Follow the link for the last quotation, Jane Wilson, read the first paragraph and anything else you care to, and then come back here and tell me she's illiterate. DAVilla 17:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. But, what good is it putting blog links in? Is that supposed to convey an added sense of illiteracy? Those are not durably archived, (not guaranteed to be working links to that exact text one year from now) so why are they there? --Connel MacKenzie 17:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I dont think it passes RFV. To WT:LOP and deleted. Andrew massyn 13:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, you're going to make me dig through all the scanos at Google books, aren't you? Very well (sigh). Revived and further cited. DAVilla 03:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)