Jump to content

Talk:ungroundable

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Equinox in topic RFV discussion: April–November 2017

Request for verification

[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Never heard of this term. Attestation required. Razorflame 22:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cited, I think...? It's "grounding" in the sense of finding a rational basis for, not being forbidden from going out by your mum. Equinox 22:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Rfv passed, then. It looks well-cited enough now. Razorflame 22:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


RFV discussion: April–November 2017

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


"Unable to be grounded (kept in as a punishment)." Only in South Park? Equinox 18:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

How do you ground that which is ungroundable? --WikiTiki89 18:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
It could have an electrical sense too. Is that attestable? —CodeCat 18:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Most of what I can find, while it may be an independent use, refers to the South Park episode. I found one quote that did not refer to the South Park episode:
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2956: Parameter 1 is required.
Perhaps a third could be found on Google groups? Kiwima (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Nothing on Usenet. Khemehekis (talk) 18:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Rather than just deleting this entry, I would be happier if we merged all entries into a single definition "not groundable". That way, we do not eliminate what is obviously a valid, if rare, meaning. Kiwima (talk) 21:30, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Since that violates the rule of "one line, one sense", it might cause problems with translations, glosses, sense IDs, etc. Equinox 21:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply