Talk:undevicesimal
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by This, that and the other in topic RFV discussion: May–June 2023
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
- Discussion moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/English.
No verifiable citations. "Category:en:Nineteen" exists here, but had no prior mention of "undevicesimal"; and Wikipedia dab page w:Nineteen also exists, but does not mention "undevicesimal". The major actual English usage of this word appears to be in multiple pages of xen.wiki, not an RS. – .Raven (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- WP is not considered a RS for Wikt even when it uses a word, let alone when it doesn't. kwami (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Again, you mention no other source, other than adding the term to that category. The page has no citations in the tab which exists for that purpose. So should we speedy-delete this as entirely sourceless? Or will you provide actual RSs? – .Raven (talk) 07:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Raven, I've experienced enough of your trolling and bad-faith arguments that I don't bother reading much of what you write. And I don't see you nominating the thousands of other entries with red citation tabs for speedy deletion, just those of someone who dared to reject your fake sources and untenable OR on WP. But, let's see ... remember that "Google Books" site that I introduced you to? You could try there before taking up people's time. I count 4 hits in English. Plus of course there are people here who have resources I don't, so even with just 1 or 2 hits at GBooks it's possible someone will be able to come up with more. (Also, last I remember, entries require at least two uses a year apart.) kwami (talk) 22:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- "fake sources and untenable OR" – You may be referring to this, but if so have misstated the rôles. – .Raven .talk 08:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Raven, I've experienced enough of your trolling and bad-faith arguments that I don't bother reading much of what you write. And I don't see you nominating the thousands of other entries with red citation tabs for speedy deletion, just those of someone who dared to reject your fake sources and untenable OR on WP. But, let's see ... remember that "Google Books" site that I introduced you to? You could try there before taking up people's time. I count 4 hits in English. Plus of course there are people here who have resources I don't, so even with just 1 or 2 hits at GBooks it's possible someone will be able to come up with more. (Also, last I remember, entries require at least two uses a year apart.) kwami (talk) 22:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Again, you mention no other source, other than adding the term to that category. The page has no citations in the tab which exists for that purpose. So should we speedy-delete this as entirely sourceless? Or will you provide actual RSs? – .Raven (talk) 07:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- I find one use:
- 1985, Eduard W. Wette, “Inconsistent Polynomials, Geometrostatic and Theometric Locating of Monads, Tractatus-Residue”, in Philosophie des Geistes, Philosophie der Psychologie : Akten des 9. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums : 19. bis 26. August 1984, Kirchberg am Wechsel (Österreich)[1], page 562:
- E is semipolynomial over Ω with varying undevicesimal degree, trilinear in the 19-length of subinputs […]
- This, that and the other (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- A second cite is on the citations page. Can a third be found? This, that and the other (talk) 12:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @This, that and the other: I added a cite to the entry. J3133 (talk) 12:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @J3133: Ah, wonderful! RFV-passed then. This, that and the other (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @This, that and the other: I added a cite to the entry. J3133 (talk) 12:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- A second cite is on the citations page. Can a third be found? This, that and the other (talk) 12:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)