Jump to content

Talk:twenty-five to

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: January–March 2020

RFD discussion: January–March 2020

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


And five to, ten to, quarter to, twenty to, five past, ten past, quarter past, and the attributive forms five-to, ten-to, quarter-to, twenty-to, five-past, ten-past, and quarter-past. The info is already at to and past; there's no need for such specific numbers. We could just as easily have forty-one past. (Sidenote: there is no noun sense at quarter for a quarter hour.) Ultimateria (talk) 19:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"forty-one past" scarcely exists as a phrase by itself AFAIAA (though "forty-one minutes past (the hour)" is possible of course). The only ones in practical use, as far as I know, are the multiples of five. I would be inclined to keep these as sufficiently idiomatic. The attributive forms may be deleted per this vote, provided the definitions contain no more content than "attributive form of unhyphenated phrase". Mihia (talk) 23:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's not true that only multiples of 5 are in regular use. It's just that it's unusual to use these forms for larger numbers. I regularly use and hear things like seven to (more common) or seven after (less common without the hour). Andrew Sheedy (talk) 04:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Keep all. SemperBlotto (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
The translations are translations of, specifically, “twenty-five to two” (1:35 am or pm), and not of twenty-five to the next hour, which could also be 12:35 or 2:35.  --Lambiam 14:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Tribbles! Delete them before they multiply. It is best handled at to. If all of these tos are kept then the equivalent tills will need to be entered also (five till, ten till, quarter till, &c.) -Mike (talk) 23:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
And the afters: ten after, quarter after, twenty-five after, etc. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 04:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete all. Canonicalization (talk) 10:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply