Talk:ture
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 years ago by SemperBlotto in topic ture
From RFV
[edit]The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
English sense. Looks like a protologism to me. SemperBlotto (talk) 17:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- This is impossible to search for properly due to millions of hyphenation artifacts, scannos for cure, and the existence of Ture as a name. Even so, the only usage I could find was Donald Knuth's proposing of it as a word. There are a few other instances where people try to come up with a hypothetical word that Turing could be the present participle for, but the definitions don't match this one. I find it telling that the usex is taken verbatim from Knuth, and that the Wikipedia link is to an article about the w:Alan Turing Year, which has nothing to do with the term itself. All the circumstantial evidence points to an attempt to promote a protologism that the contributor would like to see adopted rather than documentation of a real word in actual use. Chuck Entz (talk) 18:33, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, those were my findings as well. Removed. SemperBlotto (talk) 08:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)