Talk:trivialism
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Sense 2 of trivialism: 'The theory that every proposition and its negation is true.' I don't think this sense of the word is ever used except by a few crackpot ivory tower philosophers. Since there are no trivialists, I don't think it is a topic discussed often, its not even refuted often because nobody believes in the idea anyway. I believe this is a very rare use of the word. RandomScholar30 (talk) 15:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- This should be an WT:RFV, not an RFD; but I've just added three citations to ensure it would pass. Equinox ◑ 15:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. There are no unicorns either, but that isn't an argument against having the entry! Equinox ◑ 15:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per nomination and Equinox. Rareness isn't a reason to exclude something unless it's so rare it can't be shown to exist. And this can. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep DCDuring TALK 18:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Only nominator thinks RfD is appropriate; all other votes are "keep" or "move to RfV" Purplebackpack89 15:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)