Jump to content

Talk:tremendously

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion

RFV discussion

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: In a tremendous manner. The other (new) sense is more like "to a tremendous degree". DCDuring TALK 16:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

This was done by new-adverb template ("in a ___ manner"), fwiw.​—msh210 18:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well, I didn't get the e-mail until now. (Thanks) I assume (hope, actually) that its use has run its course except for adverbs derived from new adjectives. OTOH, there are plenty where there has been hand attention and the problem remains. I think English adverbs are pretty far down on most folk's priorities. Also many adverbs don't even get their own entries in dictionaries, so there is a lack of good models for definitions. And the dismissal of adverbs as a residual class in some grammar and language books is no help. Not to mention that many English writing guides suggest that their use is somehow reprehensible. DCDuring TALK 23:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Oh. That new-adverb. I don't know if it's worth changing, though it doesn't use en-adv either and most de-adjectival -ly adverbs presumptively have comparatives. I may just keep a watch on new additions to the category, which are not abundant. — This unsigned comment was added by DCDuring (talkcontribs) at 00:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC).Reply

RFV failed, sense removed. —RuakhTALK 00:33, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply