Jump to content

Talk:titty-toucher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ioaxxere in topic RFV discussion: November 2022–February 2023

RFV discussion: November 2022–February 2023

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Added everything I could find on Google Books, Google Groups, and the Internet Archive to Citations:titty-toucher, but I'm not impressed. The 1994 Usenet post seems like a riff on the 1977 book, the 2002 and 2004 quotes don't hyphenate it, and all of these uses are at least as well explained by the literal definition "one who touches titties" as they are by "A sexually promiscuous or voracious male". In this literal sense it may be SOP, and there don't seem to be any citations of the spaceless variant "tittytoucher" in any of the aforementioned places to save it via WT:COALMINE. 98.170.164.88 07:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Re definition: presumably it can't refer to a gay male either, who would be uninterested in "titties". Equinox 12:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Same as the above, but there are even fewer hits. All I found were two posts by the same person on Usenet, who also wrote one of the quotes on Citations:titty-toucher. These posts don't even hyphenate it. [1], [2] (where it occurs as part of the larger phrase "ass and tittie toucher"). I didn't find any COALMINEable hits. 98.170.164.88 07:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

RFV Failed for both, I agree that all the quotations are fully SOP. Ioaxxere (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply